image of medieval archer in tower, from Macejowski Bible SCA East Kingdom Archery Scorekeeper banner
navigate to home page

navigate to rankings list page

navigate to marshalls roster page

navigate to east kingdom archery history info page

navigate to east kingdom archery policies page

navigate to interkingdom archery competition page

Queen's and King's Archery Championship June 4, 2005

About 55 archers took the field to compete for the honor of serving Their Majesties as Archery Champions -- and to defend the Kingdom from reported dragons. All advanced from Round 1 to Round 2, for a solid day of shooting. Among the top 16 scorers, Lord Eoin MacEoghan (78 points) and Master Li Kung Lo (70) opted to step out of the competition. A tie-breaker for the 16th spot between Jacob (53) Felinfoel and Daniel Krakkenson was won by Daniel. The 16 finalists were addressed by His Majesty, Kelson, then commenced shoot-offs against their seeded competitors. Here are the results:

 
 Top 16 Quarter-Finals Semi-Finals Finals  
1
 Lorenzo il Confuso (91) Lorenzo Urho Rupert Winner
16
 Daniel Krakkenson (53) Alexis Alexis Alexis 2nd
2
 Urho of the Pines (82) Urho Rupert    
15
 Nicholas of Colechurch (54) Peter Mark    
3
 Rupert the Unbalanced (80) Rupert      
14
 Macsen Felinfoel (54) Yoshi      
4
 Mark Squirrelsbane (79) Mark      
13
 Tomaloc (55) Radagast      
5
 Radagast (79)        
12
 Paul Spearman (55)        
6
 Kusunoki Yoshimoto (76)        
11
 Osmond de Berwic (56)        
7
 Josef Gajdos (74)        
10
 Alexis of Woods End (57)        
8
 Tobyn Kembold (74)        
9
 Peter the Fletcher (69)        

Return to top of page.

Designed by
Kellswood Design
© 1998 to present, Susan Kell

Home | Rankings | Marshalls | E.K. History | E.K. Policies | I.K.A.C. | Return to top of page

Send e-mail to the Archery Scorekeeper at:

This page is not an official publication of the SCA, nor does it delineate SCA policies. The information presented here is provided as a service to the archers of the East Kingdom and other interested parties. Praise for its value or constructive criticism of its deficiencies should be directed to the scorekeeper.